The newest addition to NVIDIA’s mobile lineup (their Tegra line of products) is Parker — named after the alter-ego of Marvel’s Spiderman. Parker joins a family which includes Kal-El (Superman) [the Tegra 2], Wayne (Batman) [the Tegra 3], Stark (Iron Man) [Tegra 4], and Logan (Wolverine) [Tegra 5].
And as for NVIDIA’s high-performance computing lineup (their Tesla line of products), they’ve added yet another famous scientist: Alessandro Volta, the inventor of the battery (and the reason our unit for electric potential difference is the “Volt”). Volta joins brilliant physicists Nikola Tesla, Enrico Fermi, Johannes Kepler, and James Maxwell.
It was my very first time in Austin, and I had a blast hanging out at the various booths/panels during the day and on Austin’s famous 6th Street in the evening. Granted, I just barely missed the torrential rain of the first half of the conference (and, sadly, also had to miss out on the music and film part of the festivals), but I got to see a fair amount of the tech conference, and had a few observations I thought I’d share
A good majority of the companies paying big bucks to market there should spend their money elsewhere. This is not a ding on the conference. Nor am I even arguing that these companies are wasting time sending representatives to the conference. My two cents is that there were many companies there who were spending their money unwisely at best – whether it be on acts of branding heroism (i.e. paying to rebrand local establishments) or holding massive parties with open bars and no coherent message conveyed to the attendees about who the company is or why they should use the product. I must’ve attended at least three of the latter – and, truth be told, I can’t even remember the names of the startups that held those parties. Bad way to spend marketing dollars, or terrible way?
With that said, there were a number of companies there who definitely spent wisely (although whether or not it works is a question I leave for the marketplace). SXSW is a great venue to try to attract the attention of early adopters of consumer internet/mobile products – and it makes great sense to try to blow out marketing there as part of some major product/marketing push. Here’s two companies that I think were smart to spend a lot of money at SXSW (and, in my humble opinion, executed well):
I think Nike in pushing its digital initiatives like Nike Fuel (which I plan to write a review of :-)) spent quite wisely building its brand. They had an interesting panel on using the product, an outdoors area that looked like a mini-boot camp (no joke!), a digital billboard which alternated between a appropriately color themed and a room decked out like a club where Nike employees sold the fuel band and helped new users get them set up.
I think Nokia (yes, despite my previous post, I mean Nokia) did a great job as well – they set up a Nokia Labs party area which looked like three giant domes from the outside. Right next to the entrance there was a snow machine (I assume to recreate the Finland snow?). The Nokia folks on the inside were all dressed in labcoats (keeping with the “lab” theme) and, like with Nike, there was crazy club music being played. The bar was offering a drink made with Finnish vodka called “Lumia Liquified” (Lumia is the name of Nokia’s new high-end smartphone line). And with this hip backdrop in place, the Nokia party had multiple exhibits featuring the Lumia’s unique design (there was a great display full of the drab black phones we’re used to seeing and the Lumia’s brightly colored phone standing out), the Lumia’s Carl Zeiss lens/optics, and the Lumia’s Clear Black display technology (basically using layers of polarized glass so that the display looks black and readable under direct light). Enough for me to no longer be a Fandroid? Probably not, but I definitely left the party impressed.
Like most tech shows, there was a main exhibition floor which I had a chance to walk through. On these floors, companies assemble at booths attempting to attract customers, business partners, investors, and even just curious passerbys. One of the booths I attended was held by Norton, makers of the Symantec security software that might be running on your computer. The reason I point it out is that, through some marketing deal, they were able to capture the heart of this comic loving blogger by co-opting the branding from the coming Avengers movie. The concept was actually pretty creative, if a bit hokey: participants had to play a handful of Norton security-themed casual games (think quizzes and simple Flash games where you use Norton widgets/tools/powerups to defend a machine from attack) to collect a series of badges. At the end of the sequence, depending on how you did on the games, you are awarded a rank and given a prize. One very fun perk for me is the photo below – guess who’s now a superhero? 🙂
A few months ago I posted on DC Comic’s publicized reboot of their entire comic book franchise and argued this sort of bold action could be a good thing for the industry. Well, the reboot happened, and what’s the verdict? While there have been some very promising new books (I was particularly pleased with Grant Morrison’s Action Comics and Scott Snyder’s Batman), there were a few which, in my humble opinion, were changed for the worse.
But, while my comics fanboi rage might have been quelled had the editorial decision been made in a way to pull in new readers, such was not the case in at at least one notable book which butchered some of my favorite characters, as the following webcomic from Shortpacked illustrates:
Seriously, DC. Even discounting the fact that I’m a big Teen Titans fan (it was one of the first comic book series I actually read!) and that you butchered a great female character who already had a great degree of sensuality in your reboot into some mindless, preening nymphomaniac – how did it ever occur to you to use a character who might have been a nice “gateway comic” for new fans and turn her into something unrecognizable and unlovable? Great one, DC. I hope the next reboot works better…
(There’s a great io9 post which further illustrates the stupidity of DC here)
This is an old tidbit, but nevertheless a good one that has (somehow) never made it to my blog. I’ve mentioned before the private equity consulting world’s penchant for silly project names, but while code names are not rare in the corporate world, more often than not, the names tend to be unimaginative. NVIDIA’s code names, however, are pure marketing glory.
More so than in TV and movies, there are a lot of really terrible comic books. Even from star writers, output can be uneven in quality, and plot holes and weird, forced character development are fairly common. The forced pace of comic book publishing, and the whole insider-only, boys-only nature of how comics are produced, is often the culprit, leading to bad or crippled stories and shallow characters, especially with female characters. Superhero comics especially bring out the worst in the comic book industry.
One thing that’s often hard for beginners to grasp is that usually there is one ongoing “canonical” universe in comic books, but many stories (and most of the best ones) over the years have accumulated in “alternative” universes, where some details can vary. Don’t get hung up on the variations or contradictions. Continuity (comic-book-nerd speak for preserving and referencing years and years of backstory baggage) is severely overvalued in the comic book industry, and the best stories are often timeless and stand on their own two legs. There’s a reason why many of the books Ben and I both picked are often origin stories or stories set in “alternative” universes outside of the mainstream “canon” of comic books.
It’s worth your time to look around, cherry pick the best stories (which are often not the most marketed), and ignore the impulse to “read the whole story”. Quieter, smaller stories are almost always worth more time than the huge, universe-wide, pack-every-reference-you-can-think-of comic book stories that seem to be the trend these days in superhero comics.
In summary, seek out the gems as best as you can, and skip the oceans of bad stuff.
All very true – I’m extremely proud, not only of getting the shout-out, but to see a guy I helped bring into comics doing the same :-).
As I’ve made no secret of my love for comic books, a friend of mine who has been enjoying the latest string of comic book movies asked if I had any recommendations for comics/trade paperbacks that a “comic newbie” (i.e. someone who doesn’t know the billion years of backstory that have accumulated over time in the comic worlds) might read.
Of course I do – who do you think you’re talking to? Here’s a quick list of things I’d recommend to a new reader who’d like to see what is out there in the comic world:
Not really about superheroes
The Watchmen : Written by Alan Moore and considered to be one of the best graphic novels/comic books of all time, it’s a fascinating look at how the world might have played out differently had super-powered beings and costumed heroes existed. And, heck, they made it into a movie too! Warning: it is a little disturbingly dark.
The Sandman : This beloved series is by fan-favorite Neil Gaiman and while I’ve only linked to the first volume, if you have any love of the medium and want something more than just a superhero slug-fest, you have to read the entire collection. Its poignant and beautiful all at once.
About DC superheroes (think Batman, Superman, Wonder Woman, the Justice League)
DC: The New Frontier : This set of stories (of which I’ve only linked to the first volume) is a favorite of mine, not only because it touches a huge swath of DC comics superheroes, but because I am a huge fan of the deco-style art. The first story may leave you a little confused (it doesn’t star any prominent DC superheroes), but read on: its an important setup and helps the story span a few decades!
Batman: The Long Halloween : This is one of the quintessential Batman stories, where you get a taste not only of the richness of Batman’s “Rogues Gallery” but also his ongoing war with the Gotham mob.
Batman: Year One : Frank Miller is very hit-or-miss with me, but there’s no doubt in my mind that he had a solid hit with this one. Its probably the quintessential origin story – and its probably *the* comic which pushed DC’s depiction of Batman towards the grim-and-grittier version that you’ve seen Christian Bale play.
Gotham Central : Gotham Central was one of my favorite comic runs ever. Written by two of my favorite comic writers (Ed Brubaker and Greg Rucka), it stepped into the shoes of the police officers who operate in Gotham, home of the Batman, and goes over the difficulties of operating in a city with a vigilante and his Rogues Gallery. Very unique vantage point for character development and for seeing a different side of Batman and his world. I’ve linked to the first volume, but I’d recommend reading the entire series.
Kingdom Come : This is a “what if” storyline which provides some interesting commentary about the role of heroism in society. Set several decades into the future, it shows what happens with a world which has seemed to move past the morals of the DC superheroes we all know and love. And, unlike your traditional inked-and-penciled art, Kingdom Come was all about Alex Ross’s gorgeous painted scenes. This book is especially significant for me as it was the first trade paperback I ever bought!
About Marvel superheroes (think Spiderman, X-men, Iron Man, the Avengers)
Marvels : This is another set of stories illustrated with Alex Ross’s paintings, but it takes you on a crash course through Marvel Comics history. Like with Gotham Central, instead of seeing the world through the lens of a main character/superhero, this is told from the perspective of a photographer (and hence, the “common man”) who grows up from photo-kid to photography veteran.
The Ultimates : Like with Kingdom Come, this is another “what if” storyline which takes a look at what the Avengers, Marvel Comic’s superhero team, might look like in today’s world as a government sponsored superhero group. Full of modern references and gorgeous art from Bryan Hitch and some interesting twists on the traditional Marvel comics, this one is definitely worth a once-over.
Marvel 1602 : I promise this is my last “what if” storyline, but this storyline, by Neil Gaiman of The Sandman fame, asks what would Marvel superheroes have looked like had they been around in 1602. The art is very well done, and Gaiman does a great job of translating the Marvel characters of today into 1602 (and I got a chuckle that mutants were the target of the Spanish Inquisition – those guys never catch a break)
New X-Men : I’ve mentioned Grant Morrison on this blog before, but in addition to being a weird, bald Scottish guy, in a single run he helped to redefine the status quo of the X-Men. Mr. Morrison’s efforts made the character of Emma Frost one of the X-men “regulars”, and unlike many of his predecessors in the 1990s, he was focused quite a bit less on arbitrary mutant-phobia as he was on what it truly meant to have a large population of another species co-existing with humans. Very interesting run and, if you want to dive into some of the richer tapestry of comics, this is a good one to dive deeper into.
The art style is interesting and not all that bad (albeit a little too heavy on the inking in my mind — what do they think this is, a Batman comic?), but the bulk of the comic is told from the first person perspective of Martin Auster, head of business development at the company (that’s Doctor Auster to you, pal!). We get an interesting look at Auster’s life, how he was a medical student who didn’t really want to do a residency, and how and why he joins the company:
And, of course, what annual report wouldn’t be complete without some financial charts – and yes, this particular chart was intended to be read with 3D glasses (which were apparently shipped with paper copies of the report):
Interestingly, the company in question – United Therapeutics — is not a tiny company either: its worth roughly $3 billion (as of when this was written) and is also somewhat renowned for its more unusual practices (meetings have occurred in the virtual world Second Life and employees are all called “Unitherians”) as well as its brilliant and eccentric founder, Dr. Martine Rothblatt. Rothblatt is a very accomplished modern-day polymath:
She was an early pioneer in communication satellite law
She helped launch a number of communication satellite technologies and companies
She founded and was CEO of Geostar Corporation, an early GPS satellite company
She founded and was CEO of Sirius Satellite Radio
She led the International Bar Association’s efforts to draft a Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights
She is a pre-eminent proponent for xenotransplantation
She is also one of the most vocal advocates of transgenderism and transgender rights, having been born as Martin Rothblatt (Howard Stern even referred to her as the “Martine Luther Queen” of the movement)
You got to have a lot of love and respect for a company that not only seems to have delivered an impressive financial outcome ($600 million in sales a year and $3 billion in market cap is not bad!) and can still maintain what looks like a very fun and unique culture (in no small part, I’m sure, because of their CEO).
On Wednesday, August 31st, DC Comics will launch a historic renumbering of the entire DC Universe line of comic books with 52 first issues, including the release of JUSTICE LEAGUE by NEW YORK TIMES bestselling writer and DC Entertainment Chief Creative Officer Geoff Johns and bestselling artist and DC Comics Co-Publisher Jim Lee. The publication of JUSTICE LEAGUE issue 1 will launch day-and-date digital publishing for all these ongoing titles, making DC Comics the first of the two major American publishers to release all of its superhero comic book titles digitally the same day as in print.
While the decision to do this has been met with some controversy amongst the existing comic book fan community, I think this is a great idea.
But, the truth is I think this is the sort of thing which the comic book industry needs to do to stay relevant. For too long, the industry has taken the easy way out:
Cater to the most hardcore of fans: Its the classic Innovator’s Dilemma problem: its always easier to sell the same customers more and more profitable products than it is to pull in less profitable customers. In the short-term, this is fine – but over the long-term, this can be a disaster as the industry sees its user base dwindle. And, as I’ve mentioned before, as much of a fan as I am, even I’m finding the medium less appealing as this trend plays itself out.
Recycle old stories to make movies, TV shows, and cartoons: if the traditional comic medium itself is in danger (as I think it is if things keep going the way they are), the comics industry has adapted by pursuing movies, TV shows, and cartoons (case in point: Smallville). Now don’t get me wrong – I love that there are so many comic book-related movies. There is nothing a comic book fan wants more than to have other people interested in the characters and the stories (and, if there are fans out there who are anything like me, they revel in being able to answer questions about the backstories and characters involved). But, the problem with this approach is two things. First, this sort of medium is a classic long tail business: its great if you get a hit, but its really hard to make sure you have a hit – and, as a result, its really hard to bet the future of your business on. Secondly, unless I’m mistaken, the vast majority of the people watching these movies and shows are not becoming comic book/collectibles buyers or comic convention goers.
To me, the way forward for the industry is something that is hard and may even partially alienate the existing hardcore fanbase: but its to disrupt themselves. Yes, its easier to keep the hardcore fans happy and buying, but there’s not only a lot more money to be made by catering to a wider fanbase, if it doesn’t happen, sooner or later, something else will.
And that’s why I think that DC’s announcement is promising, for what I think the big guys need to do is:
Embrace digital: Yes, your traditional business model is tied to Diamond for distribution. But, digital will change this business the way its changed the music, movie, and newspaper industries – and unless you are quick to embrace it intelligently, you may find yourself in a very poor position.
Change your publishing schedule: Have your stories come out on a weekly basis, not a monthly one. The way to get people engaged (and to spend money) is to have them visit the comic store/website/digital store regularly. A bad 3-part story takes 3 months to finish with today’s monthly publishing schedule: that’s taking a huge risk that a fan will drop the book and forget to come back after 3 months. If the same 3-part story were finished in 3 weeks, then you have a different equation.
Be smart about product/pricing: Hardcore fans are willing to pay more for more. So, sell them trade paperbacks full of complex, intertwined stories and creator interviews/sketchbooks. Sell them 20-part stories which are full of cameos and references. Sell them special editions. But, for the mainstay storylines that should be accessible? Make them cheaper. After all, they’re the gateway drug to the full-on addiction :-). Think about new pricing models: how about $20 for “all you can eat” for one month on the digital comic store? Or how about buy a mainstay storyline and get 20% off of a related story? There’s plenty of room here.
Rationalize movie vs comic: I’m not a fan of twisting comic book storylines to fit movies. But, similarly, I worry about any casual comic book readers who pick up an issue and think to themselves: “what the heck?” It’s not easy, but the industry does need to find a way to bridge the two while staying truthful to both types of media. One idea: a free comic book “guide” (with movie stub) to smooth over the differences between the movie version and the comic version?
Get back to the character: Too often today, comic book storylines are about packing in every possible way for the world to end into a storyline. While this is something that is cool every so often, doing it too often is overkill and is oftentimes done at the expense of developing the character of the hero, the villain(s), and the supporting characters. Perry White, Aunt May, Alfred Pennyworth, and Jane Foster are not Lex Luthor, the Green Goblin, Joker, or Loki per se, but they are still important and deserve to be more than just the “scenery”.
There’s still more detail to be revealed in DC’s reboot, and its still not clear to me how much they live up to what I’ve outlined. Sadly, the pessimist in me is pretty sure they’ll fall short. But, as a fan of the medium, I hope they don’t.
This month’s paper comes from Science and is a topic which is extremely relevant to global health. As you probably know, malaria kills close to 1 million people a year, with most of these deaths in areas lacking in the financial resources and public infrastructure needed to tackle the disease. In addition to the socioeconomic factors, the biology of the disease itself is extremely challenging to deal with because the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum not only rapidly shifts its surface proteins (so the immune system can’t get a good “fix” on it) it also has a very complex multi-stage life cycle (diagram below), where it goes from being carried around by a mosquito as a sporozoite, to infecting and effectively “hiding inside” human liver cells, to becoming merozoites which then infect and hide inside human red blood cells, and then producing gametocytes which are picked up by mosquito’s which combine to once again form sporozoites. Each stage is not only difficult to target (because the parasites spend a lot of their time “hiding”), but the sheer complexity of the lifecycle means the immune system and drugs humans come up with are always a step behind.
So, what to do? While there is active work being done to build vaccines and drugs to fight malaria, the “low-hanging fruit” is getting the upper-hand on the mosquito transmission phase. Unfortunately, controlling mosquitos has become almost as bad a nightmare as dealing with the Plasmodium parasite. The same socioeconomic factors which limit medical treatment for the disease also make it difficult to do things like exterminate mosquitos. Furthermore, pesticides not only have adverse environmental impacts (i.e., DDT) but will ultimately have limited lifetimes as the mosquito population will eventually develop resistance to them.
Well, enter the enterprising scientist. I can’t say for sure, but I have to believe that the scientists here must have read comic books like Spiderman or Captain America as a kid because the approach they chose feels like it came straight out of the comic book world. But, instead of building a monstrosity like the Scorpion (pictured to the right), the researchers built a super-fungus super-soldier to control malarial transmission.
Instead of giving the powers of a scorpion to smalltime thief Mac Gargan (who then named himself, appropriately, The Scorpion), the researchers engineered a fungus which naturally infects mosquitos called Metarhizium anisopliae to:
kill the infected mosquito more slowly (as to not push mosquitos to become resistant to the fungus)
coat the infected mosquito’s salivary glands with a protein fragment called SM1 to block the malaria parasites from getting there
produce a chemical derived from scorpions called scorpine which is extremely effective at killing malaria parasites and bacteria
Pretty cool idea, right? But does it work? Figure 3 of the chart below shows the results of their experiments:
Mosquitos were fed on malaria-infected blood 11 days before they were dosed with our super-fungus. Typically sporozoites take about 2 weeks to build in any reasonable number in a mosquito’s salivary glands, so 14-17 days after exposure to malaria, the researchers checked the salivary glands of uninfected mosquitos (the control [C] group), mosquitos infected with non-super-fungus (the wild-type [WT] group), and mosquitos infected with the super-fungus (transgenic [TS] group). As you can see in the chart above, the TS parasite count was not only significantly smaller than both the control and wild type groups, but the control and wild type groups behaved exactly as you would expect them to (the parasite counts went up over time).
So, have we discovered a super-soldier we can count on to stop mosquito-borne illnesses? I would hold off on that for a number of reasons. First, on an experimental level, the researchers only looked at 14-17 days post-infection. To be confident, I’d like to see what this looks like with different doses of fungus and over longer periods of time and a wider range of mosquitos (as nearly 70 species of mosquito transmit malaria and I don’t even know what the numbers look like for other diseases). Secondly, its not clear to me what the most effective way to dose large populations of mosquitos are. The researchers maintain that you can spray this like a pesticide and the fungus will adhere to surfaces and stay effective for long periods of time – but that needs to be validated and plans need to be drawn up to not only pay for this (I have no idea how expense this is) but also to deploy it.
Lastly, and this is something that almost any naturalist or economist will tell you: human actions always have unintended consequences. At a first glance, it looks like the researchers covered their bases. They build what looks like a strategy which avoids mosquito resistance (and, because it uses at least two ways of controlling the parasite, is probably less vulnerable to Plasmodium resistance than drugs/vaccines). But, more research needs to be done to ascertain if there are other environmental or economic impacts of using something like this.
All in all, however, this looks like a promising start for what could be an interesting and inspired way to help control malaria.
One of my favorite comic blogs is CBR’s Comics Should be Good. In a recent post, the blog pointed out something which I hadn’t realized before:
Okay, this is just a weird thought that struck me after I got the news that Smallville had been renewed yet again.
I suddenly realized that there are almost as many hours of Smallville on film as there are of all the other Superman TV adaptations combined.
Boggles the mind, doesn’t it? What really pulled me up short was the startling notion that for two or three generations of grade-school kids, Smallville is their primary — maybe only — experience of any kind of Superman story at all.
It makes you wonder: is the correct interpretation that comics is dying and being replaced by a lesser art form? Or that it is simply evolving to tell its stories using a new medium? Or maybe a little bit of both?
My take is that the comics industry made a big mistake years ago in investing in creative directions which became impossible for lay-people to follow along. As devoted as I am to the medium, even I find a lot of today’s stories difficult to follow and lacking in the original character work that made them so memorable. Take Superman – when’s the last time a good Perry White story was written? Or a good Jimmy Olson? You probably have to go back over 10 years to find them.
With Smallville, the barrier to entry is not only much lower (although after ten years, even Smallville has started to fall into continuity traps), its brought back the romantic soap-opera and angst-ridden introspection which has done so well for series like the X-Men or Spiderman, and wrapped it up with an impressive array of special effects and modern television-making in a mostly-weekly format.
I hope the industry sees this both in terms of lessons to be learned about how to revitalize the original medium (make it more frequent than monthly, add back the supporting cast, reduce the dependence on excessive continuity, add back real character drama), and in terms of how they can continue to adapt their rich stories for the future.
I’ve known Mike Lee since we were both in high school doing debate. He’s a great guy, and I’ve enjoyed talking to him over the years about comic books, science, religion, and politics. He and I don’t always see eye-to-eye (translation: sometimes I think he’s nuts – come on, Mike, Kyle Rayner as the greatest Green Lantern ever?), but he’s one of the most thoughtful and intellectually humble guys I know.
For years, Marvel comics readers have known of S.H.I.E.L.D, the American super-spy organization formerly run by Nick Fury (pictured on the left, he’s the cool-looking guy with the eye-patch, not the freaky green guy who is probably a minion of HYDRA).
As a big fan of the super-spy concept, the idea of SHIELD always had intuitive appeal to me, which is why I became very excited when I found out that superstar writer Jonathan Hickman was writing a new series called S.H.I.E.L.D which would dive into the history of the SHIELD organization and how it dates back to the time of Ancient Egypt as a secret society of polymaths who sought to protect the world.
In the first issue alone (cover pictured on the right), we have already seen such famous historical (and fictional) polymaths (translation: genius in multiple fields) as:
The idea of history’s greatest geniuses as superheroes in a historical secret society is an idea that this fanboy/nerd can’t help but love (not to mention the thrill from the incorporation of the Asian polymath Zhang Heng in a comic with a predominantly Western audience), and it got me thinking, who else would it be awesome to have on this team of super-luminaries? We already know that Nostradamus and Sir Isaac Newton will play heavily in the rest of the series, but who else? The comics blog the Weekly Crisis took a quick stab at it, but I thought I’d also make my own list :-):
Joan of Arc – (shared with the Weekly Crisis) How does a peasant girl who hear voices from God take command of the French army and overthrow the British? Duh, she had to have been a SHIELD agent – perhaps even a telepath or someone with precognition (can see the future)?
Benjamin Franklin – (shared with the Weekly Crisis) Scientist. Inventor. Writer. How does SHIELD pass up recruiting a guy with this much chops? And, obviously, you would place this guy in the New World to deal with any emerging threats there!
Archimedes – A man so brilliant that the general of the invading Roman armies issued an order to capture him unharmed. History says that he died when an invading Roman soldier ignored his general’s orders. I say it was just a pretense to bring him over to SHIELD.
Hypatia – Potentially the first widely regarded female polymaths, Hypatia was the daughter of one of the last scholars associated with the Musaeum at Alexandria, one of the great repositories of ancient knowledge. Would it be so hard to believe, then, that she would have had access to the knowledge of SHIELD?
Abbas ibn Firnas – Best known for possibly attempting the first human heavier-than-air flight, ibn Firnas was a brilliant inventor and was even said to have a “room in which spectators witnessed stars, clouds, thunder, and lightning, which were produced by mechanisms located in his basement laboratory” – sounds like a possible headquarters for SHIELD operations, no?
Jābir ibn Hayyān – The first experimental alchemist, ibn Hayyan is widely considered the “Father of Chemistry.” So ahead-of-his-time was ibn Hayyan, that it is believed that the word “gibberish” was derived from a Latinized version of “Jabir” to describe the complexity of his writings. ibn Hayyan would’ve brought significant credibility and expertise to an 8th-9th century SHIELD.
Shen Kuo – A prolific scientist and inventor ahead of his times, Shen not only devised the magnetic compass and new methods of studying space but was known for documenting UFOs! If that doesn’t spell, SHIELD extraterrestrial expert, I don’t know what does.
Thomas Young – While Einstein was a brilliant physicist, Young was a brilliant physicist, linguist, and doctor. What earned him the most fame was his contributions to the deciphering of ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics through the Rosetta stone. But, he was also famous for deducing that light had wave-like properties, for understanding the nature of elasticity, for figuring out how human vision works (even concluding that human color vision depends on three different color sensors), and figuring out the nature of surface tension and capillary action. How does SHIELD pass someone like this up?
Of course, I’m not a writer – so who knows if any of these suggestions would actually make great stories (although I obviously think they will). Regardless, I’m very excited to read the coming issues of this series, and would recommend it to anyone else who has a taste for seeing major historical geniuses take on threats to the safety of the human race!
So, which other polymath/geniuses or major historical figures would you want in SHIELD?
SAN DIEGO – Sheldon Dorf, who founded the world famous Comic-Con Internationalcomic book convention, has died. He was 76.
A longtime friend, Greg Koudoulian, says the Ocean Beach resident died at a San Diego hospital on Tuesday from kidney failure. He had diabetes and had been hospitalized for about a year.
Dorf, a freelance artist and comic strip letterer, founded Comic-Con in San Diego in 1970 after moving from Detroit.
Today, the convention draws 125,000 fans a year and is a major gathering for comic book fans, artists, writers and movie stars.
Koudoulian says Dorf was friends with comic greats such as Marvel artist Jack Kirby and “Peanuts” creator Charles Schulz. He says Dorf was also instrumental in helping budding artists find audiences.
Farewell, Mr. Dorf. Hopefully you enjoy yourself in the great comic book convention in the sky…
There’s no denying it. Comic books and science fiction have more than their fair share of “only for geeks.” While I would be hard pressed to deny whoI am, I will say that my love for science fiction goes far beyond just pure escapism.
Now, I could talk about how I think comic books represent a reassuring world where the good guys triumph and where the human spirit and concepts of justice and loyalty are all that is necessary to be a hero, and how I believe that science fiction represents an optimism about the future and the importance of human emotions and morals. But instead of “taking my word for it”, why not hear Reading Rainbow host and the actor behind Star Trek’s Geordi LaForge LeVar Burton take on the subject (yes, the quotes were an intentional Reading Rainbow reference):
I’m one of those people that believes that there was some kid back in the 1960s watching Star Trek, and he kept seeing Captain Kirk pull out this communicator and flip it open – and that kid grew up and became an engineer, a designer of products, and we now have a device that is more common than the toaster. How many flip phones do you see on a daily basis? That which we imagine is what we tend to manifest in third dimension – that’s what human beings do, we are manifesting machines. The metaphor of a man who has an external electronic device, something man-made that serves him and somehow serves humanity, and that he becomes so aligned with that device, with the power of that device, that at one point he can discard it – I think that’s a real metaphor for the human journey. One day we won’t need a transporter device to get from one place to another. And it begins with the wheel and then migrates through airplanes to some future technology that we can’t produce yet but we can imagine. Imagination is really the key part of the human journey, it’s the key to the process of manifesting what our heart’s desire is.
When I was a kid, it was comic books that pointed me in that direction and from comic books I went to science fiction literature, which is still one of my most favorite genres of literature to read. Don’t underestimate the power of comics and what they represent for us and how they inform us on the journey of being human – because it’s powerful. It’s very powerful. They give us permission to contemplate what’s possible. And in this world, in this universe, there’s nothing that is not possible. If you can dream it, you can do it.
To many African-Americans, like Burton and fellow Star Trek actor/fan Whoopi Golderg, Star Trek holds a very special role in their minds:
When I was a kid, I read a lot of science fiction books and it was rare for me to see heroes of color in the pages of those novels. Gene Roddenberry had a vision of the future, and Star Trek was one that said to me, as a kid growing up in Sacramento, California, “When the future comes, there’s a place for you.” I’ve said this many times, and Whoopi (Goldberg) feels the same way – seeing Nichelle Nichols on the bridge of the Enterprise meant that we are a part of the future. So I was a huge fan of the original series and to have grown up and become of that mythos, a part of that family, and to represent people dealing with physical challenges, much like what Nichelle Nichols represented for people like Whoopi and myself, I can’t even begin to share with you what that means to me.
While I was fortunate enough to be born in an era where nobody questions the role of Asian-Americans in industry and science, I can also see why many Asian-Americans would have been similarly inspired by George Takei’s role as Sulu in the original Star Trek series.
Just as Superman sometimes refers to his battle for justice as “the Never-Ending Battle,” I refer to my annual battle with the hordes of ants who seem to use my house as a summer vacation spot as my own personal never ending battle.
My enemy: ants. Hordes of them. They infest my backyard, my home, and any other source of food they stumble upon. They number in the thousands, and their hive mind makes them as formidable as a well-programmed computer adversary. Physically obstruct one entry point? They will find another. Use poison? They will learn to take paths which are more difficult to attack.
No matter how clean we try to keep the house, they seem to be drawn to anything that even remotely smells or tastes like food. Shampoo. Soap. Toothpaste. Wet/damp areas. They are so voracious that spiders that thought they could “profit” by positioning their webs near ant trails have disappeared within 1-2 days of appearing as the ants destroy even them.
And in case you think my problem is amusing, laugh while you can, for this problem is one for all people, as it seems that a number of Argentine ant colonies around the world all happen to be part of one massive super-colony who’s size “is paralleled only be human society” (via BBC)
Argentine ants living in vast numbers across Europe, the US and Japan belong to the same inter-related colony, and will refuse to fight one another.
The colony may be the largest of its type ever known for any insect species, and could rival humans in the scale of its world domination.
In Europe, one vast colony of Argentine ants is thought to stretch for 6,000km (3,700 miles) along the Mediterranean coast, while another in the US, known as the “Californian large”, extends over 900km (560 miles) along the coast of California. A third huge colony exists on the west coast of Japan.
Whenever ants from the main European and Californian super-colonies and those from the largest colony in Japan came into contact, they acted as if they were old friends.
These ants rubbed antennae with one another and never became aggressive or tried to avoid one another.
In short, they acted as if they all belonged to the same colony, despite living on different continents separated by vast oceans.
The ants are ranked among the world’s 100 worst animal invaders. In its introduced range, the Argentine ant often displaces most or all native ants. This can, in turn, imperil other species in the ecosystem, such as native plants that depend on native ants for seed dispersal, or lizards that depend on native ants for food. For example, the recent severe decline in coastal horned lizards in southern California is closely tied to Argentine ants displacing native ant species on which the lizards feed.
Argentine ants also cause problems in agricultural areas by protecting plant pests, such as aphids and scale insects, from predators and parasitoids. In return for this protection, the ants receive a sweet excretion, known as “honeydew”. Thus, when Argentine ants invade an agricultural area, the population densities of these plant parasites increase, and so too does the damage they cause to crops.
Do you think you can kill them easily? Don’t bet on it:
Argentine ant colonies almost invariably have many reproductive queens, as many as eight for every 1,000 workers, so eliminating a single queen does not stop the colony’s ability to breed. When they invade a kitchen, it is not uncommon to see two or three queens foraging along with the workers.
Well, on the bright side, at least I know I’m not the only one who has to deal with this…
One of my favorite aspects of Charles Schulz’s Peanuts are Snoopy’s attempts at novel-writing and his classic opening sentence:
It was a dark and stormy night…
This was, of course, immediately followed by some comically ingenious sentence which made it immediately obvious that Snoopy, although quite creative (and talented! how many dogs do you know who can use a typewriter?) would probably never realize his dream of being a published beagle.
Cloud Computing/Data Center blog Data Center Knowledge has an interesting interview with Connelly on his use of some of the most mysterious and unusual settings to ever grace a novel:
Data Center Knowedge: What led you to choose a colocation center as the workplace for Wesley Carver?
Michael Connelly: [My researcher] sent me a link to a video tour of a colocation center. I was impressed by all the security and hardware, how the center was located underground and how it was protected from forces of nature as well as electronic intrusion. It was a fortress and these sort of things always interest me because it always comes down to people, who you have inside the fortress is the most important thing.
Interestingly enough (although I haven’t read it yet), the novel relies on a few real-life technical features in many data centers including cutting edge fire suppression systems, VESDA smoke detection systems, and man traps. Very impressive, considering how few people know what goes on in data centers (which is a shame as data centers are a driving force in the web/computing space, and are massive contributors to jobs in under-developed areas and local energy concerns).
To the uninitiated who don’t realize how bizarre and amazing data centers can be, check out this video of a data center in Stockholm built in what looks like a supervillain’s fortified hideout. As it was built in the Cold War, it is even said to be able to withstand a direct nuclear assault!
Now, can we make the next James Bond movie in a Google data center?
Yup, we are talking about none other than this past weekend’s NBA/Sprite slam dunk contest. Where the New York Knick’s own Nate Robinson decked out in all green triumphed over last year’s winner “Superman” Dwight Howard.